SO IT ENDS.

*Written on 28.2.2021.


So it ends, 

From those lovely morning texts to sleepless conversations. 

Those said sugar coated lines sweeter than the smell of spring.

That try hard romance just to get a glimpse of that distant smile and validation.

Those teeming emotions we couldn't limit ourselves with.


That October we talked till we were sober, 

of fantasies, dreams, places and things.

Those awkward silences and those shy infatuated smiles

That failed quarrels and silly anger for a while

Those buried wounds we revealed and 

that alter ego we concealed 

That pretty quarantine music, we often dozed off with.


Those follies we couldn't fix and  

That trust we couldn't reap

Those miscommunications we couldn't fix and that love we couldn't keep. 

We were eluded into falling so deep. 

What if we never fell off the cliff?

Deviated from "We could have been" to "how we would have been" 


And now, she slides gently into the arms of another.

With that faded smile and erased memory, 

cupid mocks when she kisses him, 

there's so much to remember and so little to forget 

but feelings fade and so does she.

 


Greetings, I am a young legal professional and a proud Gorkha who’s eager as a morning bird, loves poetry and drama, listens to the Floyd and the Beatles, admires the court craft and is passionate about the little things that adds immense value.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE PRACTICE OF EXHIBITION OF DOCUMENTS UNDER THE INDIAN LAW.

Exhibition of a document in judicial proceedings is a standard customary practice that has been followed for a long period of time. There isn’t any specific provision under the law that governs the  expression ‘ exhibit ’   or ‘marking’ of documents. There are only certain rules laid down in the Delhi High Court (original side) rules with regard to the mandatory marking of the document with exhibit or labeling of every document produced during trial. PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE ADMISSION OF DOCUMENTS. Order 13 Rules 3 and 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 stipulates rules for admission or rejection of documents. The same read as follows: Rule 3   - Rejection of irrelevant or inadmissible documents. ― The Court may at any stage of the suit reject any document which it considers irrelevant or otherwise inadmissible, recording the grounds of such rejection. Rule 4  -  Endorsements on documents admitted in evidence. ― (1) Subject to the provisions of the next foll...
Read more

(ORDER XII RULE 6) JUDGEMENT ON ADMISSION ON THE BASIS OF ORAL ADMISSION MUST BE CLEAR, CATEGORICAL, UNAMBIGUOUS & UNCONDITIONAL.

  Order XII Rule 6 of the CPC stipulates that the court may at any stage of the proceeding can pass a Judgement on the basis of the Admission made by the party in the pleadings or otherwise orally or in writing. Order XII Rule 6 of the CPC reads thus: Judgment on admissions.— (1) Where admissions of fact have been made either in the pleading or otherwise, whether orally or in writing, the Court may at any stage of the suit, either on the application of any party or of its own motion and without waiting for the determination of any other question between the parties, make such order or give such judgment as it may think fit, having regard to such admissions.  (2) Whenever a judgment is pronounced under sub-rule (1) a decree shall be drawn up in accordance with the judgment and the decree shall bear the date on which the judgment was pronounced. Order XII Rule 6 is an enabling provision that provides complete discretion to the court to pass a judgement on admission on the basis ...
Read more

A GREATER IMMUNITY TO JUDGES OF SUPREME COURT AND HIGH COURT WHEN IT COMES TO IMPEACHMENT

This is a guest post contributed by Mr. Rajat Joshi, Advocate. The views expressed are completely personal without the intent to harm anyone or the institution. Does the constitution protect this nation's judges from being removed o r has the executive turned a blind eye to the increasing immorality of  sitting judges who have sworn to protect and uphold the integrity of the constitution of this great country. Recently,  A speech delivered by Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court   on December 8, 2024  garnered massive controversy and made national headline. The sitting judge had publicly expressed  his bias nes s against the Muslim Community at an event organized by the legal cell of the   Vishwa Hindu Parishad within the Court Premises , T h is   again  highlighted  the judges  immunity  from  impeachment or removal from  the  office  of the  Indian Judicial System. Fifty-Five MPs of the ...
Read more